in

SharePoint Blogs

The Best Place for SharePoint-related Blogs

DontPanic

  • Debian security flaws, more of them. But it's still sovery safe they keep telling us?

    The Debian Security Advisory posted up DSA-1571-1 openssl -- predictable random number generator issue today and strongly advised its users to take steps to avoid possible compromising of any systems running on Debian, such as Ubuntu.

    The researcher Luciano Bello discovered a security flaw in Debian's random number generator that allows to predict a random generated number. This is caused by an incorrect Debian change to the openssl package. As a result, cryptographic key material may be guessable.

    This problem not only affects Debian, but also all its derivatives, such as Ubuntu.

    It is strongly recommended that all cryptographic key material which has been generated by OpenSSL versions starting with 0.9.8c-1 on affected systems is recreated from scratch. Furthermore, all DSA keys ever used on affected systems for signing or authentication purposes should be considered compromised.

    News Source: Debian Security Advisory DSA-1571-1

     

  • Red Hat gives up on desktop Linux!

    Repost from http://absolutevista.com/blogs/absolutevista/default.aspx check out his blog
    Red RHAT gives up on desktop Linux! Film at 11!

    Really, though, who didn't see this coming?

    Who?

    The unwashed mob that is known as freetards collectively by the rest of the human race (and affectionately as the Linux-heads by the open source proletariat), really, truly, wanted this to work.

    However, between what they wanted, and what works is something known as the wishes of the customer.

    AKA, reality.

    Too bad those clowns almost never seem to move out of the reality distortion field that is the echo chamber of their communities.

    Lesson #1: The customer (however dumb-seeming) is ALWAYS right. Always!

    Lesson #2: Ease of use matters. Segueing from #1 above, it does not matter if Linux distros are the most powerful things since fried bread, if Average John Joe cannot use it. Listen, the International CXT is the real man's pickup truck. However, since the Real Man cannot drive that monstrosity, a mere Silverado will have to do.

    Lesson #3: Technical merits do not matter in day-to-day work. Microsoft learned this the hard way, and is still battling to reach the sweet spot at the intersection of ease-of-use and power. However, to hear these freetards put it, Linux is the most powerful OS out there. Zzzzzzzzzzz!

    Lesson #4: Get out of your grannies' basements echo chambers of L-head communities and into the real world, and ask what people really want. What is also very problematic is the gang-tackling people get whenever they try to ask for help from the 'experts' in those communities: they get shouted away. Which is sooo helpful, right? While it is not unlike the Mactards, at least those Mactards have the elegance of OS X and the snob appeal that comes with it. These yobs do not. And do not realize that!

    Lesson #5: No one wants to go trolling in your communities for drivers. "Anytime you want a driver, just go to the <insert URL/name here> to get it. That might be fine for hobbyists, but real-world it, and that precept falls down. Yeah, like I would do so in a consumer or business environment.

    Lesson #6: No one (in his or her right mind) wants to recompile ***, OK? No one! Like #5 above, feel free to assume that Average Joe ain't gonna recompile jack. Ever!

    Lesson #7: If it is so 'free', why charge more than commercial programs for service? You need to see the way these yum-yums are selling this to companies, especially in this recessionary period in the US of A, and to the Third World less-developed countries. It is free. No need to pay for anything? Well, unless you count our services as an expense. However, that little nugget of information is never explicit, just subdulously added to the contract. When it comes time to pay, and scales have fallen from the eyes of stunned buyers, do the ramifications of their signed contracts come into play. If not, how else do you explain the non-orders the OLPC received from numerous countries? After due diligence, they found out it would be far cheaper to pay more for a Microsoft Windows-based system initially than get a 'free' system for which it would cost them more over the long run for 'service' or 'maintenance' or whatever those yum-yums class their fleecing in their invoices.

    Lesson #8: Open source is the ultimate lock-in. With the supposedly free entry, you are locked into this netherworld of incompatible file format hell. Like a drug addict, you can only move your data between shadowy niche products and vendors, always wondering when your supplier would be nabbed by the bankruptcy or irrelevancy constabulary. However, you 'helpful' open source professional would constantly tell you it is OK, regaling you with tales of how you are helping the planet or some similar BS. Don't drink the Kool-aid!

    So far, Linux has fed off the UNIX ecosystem.

    Correction, it has fed off the low-hanging fruit in that ecosystem.

    The big dogs there have held their own. Look at the flat-lining growth curve for Linux, and extrapolate that to the real world.

    The apologists for Linux would have you believe that each downloaded copy is recopied severally amongst systems.

    Yeah.

    Whatever!

    A great American leader once said, "Trust, but verify."

    Verify. Sounds simple, but something the freetards only want to happen when it comes to sales of Windows Vista. Just like their moronic attacks on the standardization of Open XML. It is good for the goose, but not for them, eh?

    Red RHAT gives up on desktop Linux?

    Like I give a (Red) RHAT's ass!

    Like I have said time and time again, there will be no Linux revolution.

    Believe that!

  • Important Outlook 2007 and Vista Users!

     

    My setup: I have a Dell Precision 690,  Windows Vista Ultimate, 64-bit.

    After a day of being pissed off at Outlook 2007 because it wont stop auto starting and showing up in Task Manager even after a hard kill task.

     Issue: Outlook 2007 gets closed by (End Task, Office Start Exit, X Close) goes away on screen but pops up in Task Manager after seconds. I am trying to setup Outlook Anywhere 2007 to test a remote Exchange 2007 server but I can't because every time I try to run the Outlook 2007 Exchange setup it says Outlook must be closed. I close it but it comes back in task manager!!! This is frustrating, I've had problems with Outlook 2007 not closing out of processes but never where it comes back a few seconds later.

     

    Make your guesses what do you think it is?

    I found out after some words with the computer that my Sidebar Outlook Widget was at fault, even when closing outlook the Widget auto starts Outlook 2007 backup in the background in second for you. How nice. Turn off this widget and it's all better.

     

  • Microsoft fastest to issue OS patches, beats Linux with Sun Slowest

    Symantec's comprehensive security report on the malware industry from July 1 to December 31, 2007, is now avaible in its 100+ page glory. Symantec broke down information on patch development time by operating system and by the type of vulnerability encountered. Surprisingly, Microsoft had the shortest time-to-patch over both halves of 2007. In the first part of the year, Microsoft released 38 patches (two of which involved third-party applications) with an average deployment time of 18 days. From July to December, Microsoft released 22 patches with an average patch time of six days.

    Red Hat came in second, at 32 days for the second half of the year and 36 days in the first half. That's quite a bit higher than Microsoft's average, but of the 227 vulnerabilities Red Hat patched in 2007, 226 of them involved third-party applications. Apple, Sun, and HP all lag well behind Microsoft and Red Hat, though the gap for each company differs significantly between the first and second halves of last year.

    News Source: Symantec

  • White hat hackers infiltrate a power grid in one day

    White hat hackers infiltrate a power grid in one day

    By Tim Conneally, BetaNews

    April 10, 2008, 3:31 PM

    A team of experts headed by security guru Ira Winkler was hired by an anonymous power company to test the security of a power grid's network. The door was practically held open for them.

    In a matter of hours, the team infiltrated the grid's supervisory, control and data acquisition (SCADA) networks using simple phishing tools: social engineering and browser exploits.

     

    Social Engineering is seen by many as a glamorized confidence trick. The penetration team checked distribution lists for SCADA user groups, harvested appropriate email addresses, and then employed a simple trick to gain the targeted user's access. Employees were sent an e-mail about a plan to cut their benefits which included a link to a Web site with "more information." The address linked to a malware that granted the hackers remote access. The trick was effective within minutes.

     

    What could be done given the level of access these white hats obtained would not be limited to simply shutting down a grid, like a group of hackers managed to do for 17 days to a "practice network" in California in 2001. In comments to CNN last year regarding a leaked video of a staged hack that resulted in the self-destruction of a power generator, Joe Weiss of Applied Control Solutions said, "What people had assumed in the past is the worst thing you can do is shut things down. And that's not necessarily the case. A lot of times the worst thing you can do, for example, is open a valve -- have bad things spew out of a valve."

    Winkler says that these SCADA systems suffer the same vulnerabilities any system does that runs on the same standard operating system and server hardware. Companies have perpetuated the weakness of these systems by not performing important software upgrades because they would force downtime.

    But a scheduled downtime is no doubt preferable to suffering the consequences of an exploit. Winkler stressed the seriousness of security in these systems while maintaining a lighthearted air to his job, "We had to shut down within hours," Winkler says, "because it was working too well. We more than proved that they were royally screwed."

    Ten years ago Wired published an article called Hacking the Power Grid, which included the following: "With deregulation, there is an increasing interest in energy futures trades at the commodities exchange on Wall Street. [IBM senior consultant Nick] Simicich said hackers might use social engineering techniques to obtain passwords to computers with access to the networks containing sensitive information from these sources."

    Apparently little has changed in a decade.

  • Microsoft and Yahoo! sites compared. Check it out. Numbers you can never find updated.

    Microsoft and Yahoo! sites compared: a quick look at the numbers

    by Kip Kniskern on 04-08-2008 | with no comments | 412 views

    With all the talk about Microsoft's attempted acquisition of Yahoo!, and with a little help from Nielsen Online, we thought we'd make a quick comparison of some of the main features of both services.  I asked Nielsen if they could supply audience numbers to a sampling of sites from both, and then played a bit with Excel to produce this quick look:

    msftyhooFeb08

    source: Nielsen Online "Unique audience includes anyone who visited the site at least once during the month, and anyone who visited the site more than once was not counted again."

    Accurate audience measurement numbers are hard to come by, and we've noted some differences in the market rating services before (and more on that coming up), but at least this gives an apples to apples comparison of audience numbers (and note that this isn't market share, but unique audience).

    The purpose of this little exercise was not to show trends, or make comparisons to other sites/properties, but just to get a bit of a handle on where the two companies sit in relation to each other, and what a potential joining of forces might mean.

    For clarity, here's the February raw numbers, supplied by Nielsen:

    Site Feb-08
    MSN Homepage 46,093,000
    Yahoo! Homepage 65,832,000
    MSN/Windows Live Messenger 23,862,000
    Yahoo! Messenger 21,763,000
    MSN/Windows Live Search 42,082,000
    Yahoo! Search 55,312,000
    MSNBC Digital Network 34,013,000
    Yahoo! News 35,274,000
    Windows Live Hotmail 39,616,000
    Yahoo! Mail 58,657,000

    from http://www.liveside.net/

     

     

  • SQL 2k5 has a 98GB log file for WSS3. But diag is set to errors only and we backup daily to an external hd

    I've been searching for days why our server with 200GB of space just running DC and SQL is out of space. I found 98GB log file with a 9GB data file. Where is the setting in SQL to fix this. I checked WSS3 and it's set to Error's and unexplained only.

     

    Changed to simple and the file went from 97GB to 500KB.

     

  • Hmm, funny I didn't hear about this anywhere else.

    Jeremy Kirk, IDG News Service Thu Mar 27, 12:59 PM ET

    Apple's teasing commercials that imply its software is safer than Microsoft's may not quite match the facts, according to new research revealed at the Black Hat conference on Thursday.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Researchers from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology looked at how many times over the past six years the two vendors were able to have a patch available on the day a vulnerability became publicly known, which they call the 0-day patch rate.

    They analyzed 658 vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft products and 738 affecting Apple. They looked at only high- and medium-risk bugs, according to the classification used by the National Vulnerability Database, said Stefan Frei, one of the researchers involved in the study.

    What they found is that, contrary to popular belief that Apple makes more secure products, Apple lags behind in patching.

    "Apple was below 20 [unpatched vulnerabilities at disclosure] consistently before 2005," Frei said. "Since then, they are very often above. So if you have Apple and compare it to Microsoft, the number of unpatched vulnerabilities are higher at Apple."

    It's generally good for vendors to have a software fix available when a vulnerability is disclosed, since hackers often try to find out where the problem is in order to write malicious software to hack a machine.

    For a vendor to have a patch ready when the bug is detailed in public, it needs to get prior information from either its security analysts or external ones. Otherwise the vendor has to hurry to create a patch, but that process can be lengthy, given the rigorous testing needed to test the patch to ensure it does not conflict with other software.

    Apple only started patching 0-day vulnerabilities in late 2003, Frei said.

    "We think that Apple had fewer vulnerabilities early on, and they were just surprised or not as ready or not as attentive," Frei said. "It looks like Microsoft had good relationships earlier with the security community."

    Over the past few years, Microsoft has tried to cultivate a closer relationship with the security community in order to encourage researchers to give it a heads-up about software problems. Apple, however, doesn't appear to have that same sort of engagement yet, and, "based on our findings, this is hurting them," Frei said.

    Curiously, both vendors' abilities to have 0-day patches ready at disclosure seemed to dip in the six months before a major product release. That trend was most pronounced in 2004 and 2005. Frei theorized that the buildup to big software releases took away software engineering resources.

    Andrew Cushman, director of Microsoft's Security and Research, said he couldn't pinpoint what might cause that trend. But in 2004 and 2005, Microsoft had a rash of vulnerabilities pop up in its Office products that it did not get advance notice of, which may have contributed to a higher percentage of unpatched publicly disclosed bugs.

    However, the study proved to be such a glowing affirmation of Microsoft's increased focus on security in the past few years that it prompted Cushman to ask Frei, "Did Microsoft fund this research?"

    "This is independent academic research," Frei replied.

  • But they keep telling us it's so safe and it's the best?

    Contributed by Aleck79 via Web-User 20 hours ago · There are 34 comments
    An Argentinian security researcher has discovered two flaws in Apple's Safari for Windows browser. Juan Pablo Lopez Yacubian said the vulnerabilities could allow hackers to remotely take control of a victim's computer. He described the most serious flaw as a vulnerability in the Safari 3.1 browser for Windows which allows a hacker to “falsify the web address and enter another page or content".

    This essentially means that even though you see a trusted URL in the browser address bar, the web page could be displaying unauthorized content that could put your PC at risk.

    Link: Read More at Web-User
  • Outlook 2007 diag tool (Ctrl+right click on Outlook taskbar icon next to time)

    This is a great tool and saved me a great deal of time.

  • Apple Tuesday issued a record-breaking security update that patched nearly 90 vulnerabilities in both its own code and the third-party applications it bundles with its Tiger and Leopard operating systems. Security Update 2008-002 plugged 87 holes!!!

     

    Neowin.net reports 

    Apple Tuesday issued a record-breaking security update that patched nearly 90 vulnerabilities in both its own code and the third-party applications it bundles with its Tiger and Leopard operating systems. Security Update 2008-002 plugged 87 holes in the client and server editions of Mac OS X 10.4 and Mac OS 10.5, This single update's total patch count nearly equaled half of all the fixes Apple released in 2007, and easily dwarfed the biggest updates that year, both which saw 40 or more bugs patched.

    "What a dizzy double take," said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Network Security in an e-mail. "Right on the heels of an unprecedented giant Safari fix, we now have a frighteningly large set of updates for OSX 10.4.11 and 10.5.2." Earlier today, Apple updated its Safari browser for both Mac and Windows, patching 13 vulnerabilities.

    View: The full story @ InfoWorld

    http://www.neowin.net/news/main/08/03/19/apple-issues-mega-monster-security-update

     

    But it's so safe and doesn't have any KNOWN problems!!! Ha! Ha! Vista had less!

  • Windows XP Disconnect or Kill old Offline Sync for My Document or other folder that are gone?

    Every time we change servers for file stores of user files the old Offline File syncs still pop-up and try to sync but the Shared folder is gone. How do I kill or disconnect the Offline File Sync after the folder is deleted? Also applies when moving from SBS to full server.

     

    Note: I updated all of the User folders on ADC Users and Computers so this sync should be gone anyways but changing ADC doesn't stop the sync task from running at login and off.

    I've been unable to un-click Make Available Offline. It's grayed out. I think because the shared folder is gone.

  • XP SP2 vs Vista RTM and Vista SP1... Hmm, almost equal or better on everything goes to Vista. I'd like to see this on a Quadcore with 4GB Ram.

    Adrian Kingsley-Hughes from ZDNet.com executed the tests using the AMD Phenom 9700, Radeon 3850 graphics card, 2GB of RAM and ATi Catalyst drivers 8.2.

    The three games which performed better on Vista than on XP SP2 were Call of Duty 4, F.E.A.R. and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.
    Vista gave The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion the best performance boost compared to XP SP2, working out at an average of 9 frames per second faster on Vista RTM and 13 frames per second faster on Vista SP1.

    Seven out of ten of the games tested produced frame rate averages which were lower under Vista than XP SP2, however, a closer look at the numbers shows that when Vista is slower than XP SP2, the actual frame rate differences are only in the single digits.

    Here are the results: average frame rates for each game on each platform

    CoD4
    XP SP2: 56 fps | Vista RTM: 58 fps | Vista SP1: 62 fps

    Fear
    XP SP2: 70 fps | Vista RTM: 71 fps | Vista SP1: 71 fps

    Oblivion
    XP SP2: 56 fps | Vista RTM: 67 fps | Vista SP1: 69 fps

    Bioshock (DX9)
    XP SP2: 50 fps | Vista RTM: 46 fps | Vista SP1: 47 fps

    CoH
    XP SP2: 30 fps | Vista RTM: 28 fps | Vista SP1: 28 fps

    Crysis
    XP SP2: 27 fps | Vista RTM: 24 fps | Vista SP1: 23 fps

    Doom3
    XP SP2: 157 fps | Vista RTM: 138 fps | Vista SP1: 142 fps

    SC
    XP SP2: 47 fps | Vista RTM: 44 fps | Vista SP1: 44 fps

    UT3
    XP SP2: 68 fps | Vista RTM: 64 fps | Vista SP1: 65 fps

    WiC
    XP SP2: 24 fps | Vista RTM: 22 fps | Vista SP1: 22 fps

     

  • SharePoint 2007 and Outlook 2007 Email

    Does anyway know of the list of all fields that can be passed between SharePoint 2007 and Outlook 2007 for Email.

    I need them for Discussion and Document Library.

    I don't like Document Library as much as Discussions because you can't copy and paste from Outlook 2007 where as with Discussions you can copy paste right from Outlook 2007 but I seem to loss some fields I'd like to get back.

     

    Working on an Email Archive solution.

  • Canon Image Classic 2300 doesn't work with Exchange 2007 for scan to email (iFax)

    I love when companies hide information like this.

    Some other systems don't work either. Please contact 1-800-423-2366 Option 2 if you have a Canon Copier that doesn't work with Exchange 2007 for Scan to Email (ifax) and let them know.

  • Windows XP vs Vista (Vista is the pathway to better human interaction)

    Microsoft needs to move faster and further. Direct X10 alone is worth Vista just buy a new computer for it and your set. These people who want to stay in XP are the same people who are still in 98 and 2000 your stupid this is a forward moving Country and we WILL not let some scared little brats hold up the progress and advancement in to a none keyboard mouse interface. It's time to loss the baggage and make some steps forward. I have 5 Systems with vista that run great. I also support 50 Business systems that work great. God Bless Dell and may their investors understand the value the people have in Dell. Vista Media Center is well done and a great upgrade my wife loves media center and is very protective of it. We use four Xbox 360's with media center for TV (Microsoft HDTV for Media Center better be coming soon there is a high demand), all our music, all our HD home video and 40,000 photos in every room better than any Cable or Sat settop box out there and it's fast. I love Vista on the 65' HDTV it's amazing. But touch screens would solve the issues. The market is ready for touch screen technologies to take a bigger step in. With things like the Wii being embraced in full a touch screen computer system and HDTV system would run the market. HP has just a solution at Office Depot, now I'm no supporter of HP so Dell and Sony better have something coming out soon! Sony had a desktop 21' w/Pen LCD touch screen system out years ago but they couldn't sell it for $2,300. But now is the time a system like that for $1899 would be perfect given the Tablet Notebooks with SVGA+ screens are just now coming out at $2799Microsoft is doing what we ask them to. They are fixing all the things wrong with XP/2000 but people forgot what they disliked about XP when it came out. Linux users complain about the start menu being to big so they fixed it but now the OLD people hate vista. I think the search at the bottom is the most amazing tool there is. If that was voice controlled and you could search by voice with everything indexed you'd be set. You can't get to touch screens and away from keyboards if we don't get away from XP. Windows Vista is the path to the next generation of human interaction. Hardware accelerated desktops are required for 3D monitors coming to market. It also allows for desktops and now laptops to run HD on the desktop or to a large HDTV. My laptop can display HDMI with sound to my 65' HDTV at 1080P with ONE cable. It came with a remote built-in to control Media Center. I am very happy with Vista and so is my family. We have with Vista and Xbox 360 the things people have been complaining about for years. Why can't my Pictures show upright on the tv so I can show my friends. Why do we have to huddle around a small 19' screen to watch videos online? I vote Vista and let XP sink with the Oldies. It's our turn to take over and lead the world to a better place. People seem to hate change in America these days. You reading this is why America is losing to China if we don’t change we will get left in the dust. Wake up America!Updated:

    Then why did you ever upgrade from Windows 2000 it out performs XP and why did I have to hear the same complaints then. This isn't about choices you have choices it's about whiners who hate change being the destruction of America. Yesterday, I put a Mac user who had never used Vista, XP or Office. She started to use Vista without any help and said it was very easy just like her Mac. If it was about the money you wouldn't be complaining. It's about you feeling like Microsoft it forcing it on you so you turn in to a whiny little babe that didn’t get what they thought was the right changes. Doesn’t matter same complaint different OS, I heard these complaints about Windows 3.1, 95, 98, 2000, XP and now Vista so just staying with Dos because it’s faster you got your way with Windows 2008.

    “And it's great that you manage 50 Vista business systems. We have almost 3000 machines in our organization. Do the math for upgrading all those machines and then try and convince management that we're going to get more out of that than we would if we spent the money on our patients. (I work in a hospital)” -  Whiplash

    So you didn’t know this was coming and your solution is to stay with XP until??. Remember those old farts that wanted to and are still on Windows 98 because it was faster and easier then Windows XP. That’s YOU!!! You’re the old grumpy Fart that’s so set in their ways they don’t see the future passing bye. I’ll be waving as we step up to 64-bit and 4GB+ ram. When XP can’t run the new hardware that’s already out. Wait that’s now.

    Image the cost of skipping a complete generation of workstation, employee training, you miss out on Tags, your users get left behind while their home pc are all Vista. What about Office 2007 that’s new and being forced on you by Microsoft. I hope you stay on Office 2003 so you can waste 1/7 the space for those 3000 users on storage and redundancy.

    So how about these Windows XP missing features:

    ·         Shadow Copies on the Workstation!

    ·         DFS on the Workstation!

    ·         Tags! and indexing unless you are happy with Google Desktop Search that makes XP run like it’s Pregnant.

    ·         Direct X 10 for almost unlimited on screen objects

    ·         Dynamic desktop data

    ·         Better security, oh wait Business and Hospitals don’t care about that.

    ·         Better IE7 experience

    ·         Better performance and troubleshooting tools (Far fewer blue screens)

    ·         Better Video and Audio playback oh and Blue Ray(HD playback)

    ·         Much better updates and patching

    ·         Sidebar and Desktop tools

    ·         Vista doesn’t degrade over time like XP, think about the reloads of those 3000 systems because they are so slow over time.

    ·         Much better mobile support

    ·         Better wireless and power management

    ·         Better biometric interfaces and management.

    ·         Multiuser login, switch user login (could make up 20 minutes just here waitting for users)

    ·         Much better security for remote access, RDP and remote Assistance (What do you mean none encripted RDP in XP?) Hmm, Security worth the upgrade to you?

    But your right I’m sure all of the upcoming software packages made for Vista will run great on XP. I’m sure the software companies will do really well at supporting both Vista and XP they’ve done so great supporting XP on its own so far. I’m sure it won’t cost these companies anything to support both of which means we pay the bill.

    You won’t drive a car that’s more than 5 years old but you’ll drive an OS that you spend all day on that’s using 11 year old technology it was 1997 when Windows XP was started working and the features were decided. If you haven’t noticed it’s 2008.

    America doesn’t stand for a country of whiners and babies we stand for change, innovation and progress.

    By the way an Xbox 360 cost $270 which is the cost of a good DVD player so maybe I'm just smart with my money plus the 15 Million other users you say can't afford a Vista pc and an Xbox 360. Dell sells refurbished Vista pc's for $450 so maybe you’re the one not in the real world here. This solution cost $720, cheaper than your last pc you bought from Best Buy don’t you think.

    Added because people think this is about money and the big corp issues with spending money. I don't care Business and Corp know this was coming the should have budgeted it.

     100% of people at work go home after their corp lives. Keeping Windows XP effects them too. So all 75,000 users asking for Windows XP are all corp users. Where is Microsoft going to get the money to keep supporting XP? I say Microsoft charges for SP3 so all of you who want it can pay for Microsoft to keep it out there. I don't believe Microsoft should add features, upgrade and fix a 9 year old program for FREE just because you're a whinnier! Do you?

    20 minutes lost a day 1 employee for a year is $1,900 based on 40k and you're telling me you can't get 20 minutes a day out of Vista to justify it? The start bar search(indexed) with side bar, IE7, Office 2007, shadow copies(alone could save hours of lost or corrupt files and information), DFS, Drive Encription can't get you 20 minutes over XP? I think you might want to watch your users work, they spend 20 minutes just looking for stuff each day.

    At $1200 for each workstation with Vista and Office 2007 you'd save your company with 3000 workstation $2.1 Million Dollars next year not to count the 3 years you'd get out of the new PC's making it $6.3 Million over 3 years if you can just clean up 20 minutes a day from your wasted employee time. I bet your poor users already need a new PC.

    Good luck with your career too on Windows XP, I'll be moving on with the rest of the world. By the way it's call passion. I'm not satisfied with crap like you are.

  • SharePoint Archive solution options? Best Folder type for Copy paste from Outlook 2007?

     

    I am deploying a full SharePoint Intranet Solution with Public Folder replacement. Fully upgraded to Exchange 2007 w/ Outlook 2007. WSS 3 fully running with email enabled and FBA completly setup.

     My Questions:

    Fact: Document Folders do not support copy/paste from Outlook 2007.

    Question: What is the BEST email archive folder type? for copy/paste from Outlook.

    Reason: Sent email can be cc'ed but received email can't so I would like to have my users copy/paste these files to their correct project email archive folder. (What type of WSS3 folder is the best for this)

     

    I have tested this solution with 130,000 email in a single document folder and works great. Other then slow to display all at one time works great with some basic filters and views.

     

  • Exchange 2007 Cert's at stupid!!! But here's an important too.

    Error Reason: Private Key Missing Exchange 2007 Cert Enable-ExchangeCertificate 

    This solves the PrivateKeyMissing error when enabling imported SSL Certs. Mine was from Godaddy and I used the delete from the MMC:Cert Manager. I should have used remove-ExchangeCertificate!

    credit goes to http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:eeWeH1Qc9nQJ:www.folin.se/+exchange+2007+enable+cert+Private+Key+Missing+solution&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us

     

    RESOLUTION
    The original certificate may be repairable (from the server that initially requested the Certificate).How to assign a private key to a new certificate after you use the Certificates snap-in to delete the original certificate in Internet Information ServicesINTRODUCTION
    This article describes how to recover a private key after you use the Certificates Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to delete the original certificate in Internet Information Services (IIS). You delete the original certificate from the personal folder in the local computer’s certificate store. This article assumes that you have the matching certificate file backed up as a PKCS#7 file, as a .cer file, or as a .crt file.To assign the existing private key to a new certificate, you must use the Microsoft Windows Server 2003 version of Certutil.exe. To do this, follow these steps:

    1. Log on to the computer that issued the certificate request by using an account that has administrative permissions.
    2. Click Start, click Run, type mmc, and then click OK.
    3. On the File menu, click Add/Remove Snap-in.
    4. In the Add/Remove Snap-in dialog box, click Add.
    5. Click Certificates, and then click Add.
    6. In the Certificates snap-in dialog box, click Computer account, and then click Next.
    7. In the Select Computer dialog box, click Local computer: (the computer this console is running on), and then click Finish.
    8. Click Close, and then click OK.
    9. In the Certificates snap-in, expand Certificates, right-click the Personal folder, point to All Tasks, and then click Import.
    10. On the Welcome to the Certificate Import Wizard page, click Next.
    11. On the File to Import page, click Browse.
    12. In the Open dialog box, click the new certificate, click Open, and then click Next.
    13. On the Certificate Store page, click Place all certificates in the following store, and then click Browse.
    14. In the Select Certificate Store dialog box, click Personal, click OK, click Next, and then click Finish.
    15. In the Certificates snap-in, double-click the imported certificate that is in the Personal folder.
    16. In the Certificate dialog box, click the Details tab.
    17. Click Serial Number in the Field column of the Details tab, highlight the serial number, and then write down the serial number.
    18. Click Start, click Run, type cmd, and then click OK.
    19. At the command prompt, type the following:
    certutil -repairstore my “
    SerialNumberSerialNumber